Characterization of lower-cost medium precision atmospheric CO <sub>2</sub> monitoring systems for urban areas using commercial NDIR sensors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. CO2 emission estimates from urban areas can be obtained with a network of in-situ instruments measuring atmospheric CO2 combined with high-resolution (inverse) transport modeling. The distribution of CO2 emissions being highly heterogeneous in space and variable in time in urban areas, gradients of atmospheric CO2 need to be measured by numerous instruments placed at multiple locations around and possibly within these urban areas, which calls for the development of lower-cost medium precision sensors to allow a deployment at required densities. Medium precision is here set to be a random error (uncertainty) on hourly measurements of ±1 ppm or less, a precision requirement based on previous studies of network design in urban areas. Here we present tests of a HPP commercial NDIR sensors manufactured by Senseair AB performed in the laboratory and at actual field stations, the latter for CO2 concentration in the Paris area. The lower-cost medium precision sensors are shown to be sensitive to atmospheric pressure and temperature conditions. The sensors respond linearly to CO2 when measuring calibration tanks, but the regression slope between measured and true CO2 differs between individual sensors and changes with time. In addition to pressure and temperature variations, humidity impacts the measurement of CO2, all causing systematic errors. In the field, an empirical calibration strategy is proposed based on parallel measurements with the lower-cost medium precision sensors and a high-precision instrument cavity ring-down instrument during 6 month. This empirical calibration method consists of using a multiple regression approach to create a model of the errors defined as the difference of CO2 measured by the lower-cost medium precision sensors relative to a calibrated high-precision instrument, based on predictors of air temperature, pressure and humidity. This error model shows good performances to explain the observed drifts of the lower-cost medium precision sensors on time scales of up to 1–2 months when trained against 1–2 weeks of high-precision instrument time series. Residual errors are contained within the ±1 ppm target, showing the feasibility to use networks of HPP instruments for urban CO2 networks, provided that they could be regularly calibrated against one anchor reference high-precision instrument.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".