MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895487637 · doi:10.1080/19401493.2018.1523950

Control-oriented model of a solar community with seasonal thermal energy storage: development, calibration and validation

2018· article· en· W2895487637 on OpenAlexafffund
Étienne Saloux, José A. Candanedo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Building Performance Simulation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGeothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
FundersOffice of Energy Research and DevelopmentNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsModel predictive controlCalibrationBoreholeThermal energy storageSolar energyKey (lock)EngineeringControl (management)ThermalEnvironmental scienceControl engineeringComputer scienceMeteorologyGeographyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of a control-oriented model of a solar community with seasonal storage (the Drake Landing Solar Community) is investigated. The proposed approach, intended to facilitate the development and testing of control strategies and targeting an actual predictive control implementation, is based on grey-box models, and enables the prediction of the system state (temperatures at key locations). This paper discusses the concept of state update procedure (whereby the system state is periodically corrected with measurements), which plays a fundamental role for control purposes. Firstly, the DLSC is presented and both operation and monitoring system are described. Secondly, a simplified model is developed for each sub-system: district and solar loops, short-term (water tanks) and seasonal (borehole) thermal energy storage, and existing operation rules are encoded. Finally, the model is calibrated and validated by using measurements at 10-min intervals over two years of operation (2015–2016, 2016–2017) and accurately predicts the system performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Building Performance SimulationSame topicGeothermal Energy Systems and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207