Smed-myb-1 Specifies Early Temporal Identity during Planarian Epidermal Differentiation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The planarian epidermis provides an excellent model to explore adult stem cell (ASC) lineage development due to well-characterized and distinct spatiotemporal phases during lineage progression. Using flow cytometry-isolated cells enriched in epidermal progenitors, we performed transcriptional profiling and RNAi screening to uncover regulators of epidermal differentiation. We identified a MYB-type transcription factor (Smed-myb-1) required for the specification of the first temporal phase of post-mitotic maturation. Knockdown of myb-1 abolished the early progenitor phase of differentiation without ceasing production of subsequent epidermal progenitor states or homeostatic turnover and regeneration of the epidermis. Further examination revealed accelerated maturation of ASC descendants, with premature entry into subsequent progeny phases and, ultimately, the epidermis. These results demonstrate that a spatiotemporal shift in lineage progression occurs in the absence of the early progenitor state after myb-1 RNAi, and identify myb-1 as a critical regulator of the early temporal window in stepwise specification during planarian epidermal differentiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".