MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895502006 · doi:10.2144/btn-2018-0041

Robust Evaluation of Intermolecular FRET Using a Large Stokes Shift Fluorophore as a Donor

2018· article· en· W2895502006 on OpenAlex
Carmen Santana‐Calvo, Francisco Romero, Ignacio López‐González, Takuya Nishigaki

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBioTechniques · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Genetics
KeywordsFörster resonance energy transferFluorophoreFluorescenceCyanineChemistryAcceptorStokes shiftAlexa FluorFluorescence anisotropyPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fluorescence (or Förster) resonance energy transfer (FRET) is a straightforward and sensitive technique to evaluate molecular interactions. However, most of the popular FRET pairs suffer cross-excitation of the acceptor, which could lead to false positives. To overcome this problem, we selected a large Stokes shift (LSS) fluorophore as a FRET donor. As a successful example, we employed a new FRET pair mAmetrine (an LSS yellow fluorescence protein)/DY-547 (a cyanine derivative) to substitute CFP/fluorescein that we previously employed to study molecular interactions between cyclic nucleotide-binding domains and cyclic nucleotides. The new FRET pair is practically free of cross-excitation of the acceptor. Namely, a change in the fluorescence spectral shape implies evidence of FRET without other control experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.557

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it