Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À l’écoute de suggestions actuelles pour repenser la Providence, en affinité avec l’ Open Theism , cet article mène un exercice de discernement puis de reconstruction. L’examen critique porte sur trois remaniements sensibles : un transfert inaperçu de souveraineté de Dieu vers l’être humain, une autodétermination de Dieu à se laisser déterminer par ses créatures libres, une suspension de l’omniscience divine au bénéfice supposé de la liberté humaine. De tels déplacements sont mesurés à leurs lourdes conséquences. La reconstruction revisite l’affrontement des images de Dieu, païennes ou chrétienne ; puis considère les rapports étonnants entre nécessités et libertés selon l’évangile de Luc. Cela conduit à reformuler l’essentiel de la foi en la Providence suivant les trois articles du Credo , en termes de souveraineté, mystère pascal et synergie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it