MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895518777 · doi:10.1080/17517575.2018.1527042

Enhancing online-to-offline specific customer loyalty in beauty industry

2018· article· en· W2895518777 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnterprise Information Systems · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong Kong Polytechnic University
KeywordsLoyalty business modelBusinessCustomer retentionMarketingCustomer delightCustomer advocacyCustomer satisfactionCustomer equityCustomer to customerCustomer intelligenceCustomer profitabilityLoyaltyCustomer lifetime valueService quality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Customer loyalty is one of the core values for business success in beauty industry; however, there is insufficient research on weighing the importance of critical factors contributing to customer loyalty for the industry. This study, for the first time, investigates and ranks empirically the critical factors contributing to O2O specific customer loyalty in beauty industry by using Analytical Hierarchical Process. Results show that customer satisfaction, customer’s perceived switching costs, customer trust, corporate image and customer value positively influence O2O specific customer loyalty (in decreasing order of importance). Attributes contributing to the five critical factors have also been studied and ranked.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.693
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it