Unveiling Conversion Reaction on Intercalation‐Based Transition Metal Oxides for High Power, High Energy Aqueous Lithium Battery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Aqueous lithium batteries are reaching their energy and power limits partly due to limited capacity from intercalation chemistry. Alternatively, conversion reactions bring added capacity that can significantly increase the capacity ceiling of the cell. However, such reactions can only be realized in organic electrolytes, and similar redox chemistry in aqueous lithium batteries is not reported yet. In this work, it is discovered that a large work function difference (up to 1.78 eV) between crystalline LiMn 2 O 4 (cLMO) and semicrystalline MnO 2 (scMO) makes energy bands of MnO 2 bend downward toward their interface, resulting in the accumulation of free electrons on scMO and inducing a reversible conversion reaction between scMO and Li + in aqueous media. Based on this mechanism, a rechargeable hybrid aqueous battery employing hierarchical porous cLMO–scMO composite as a cathode delivers an extremely high cell‐level energy (171 Wh kg −1 ) and power density (5118 W kg −1 ) with excellent cycling stability (up to 3000 cycles) in a wide working temperature range (25 to 60 °C). More significantly, similar conversion reactions can also be achieved on LiCoO 2 , which provides a general design principle to obtain unprecedented energy and power density in commonly used transition metal oxides.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".