MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895585512 · doi:10.4000/traduire.1117

Témoignage : Faire connaître le sort des « hommes d’ombre »

2018· article· fr· W2895585512 on OpenAlexaff
Agnese Pignataro

Bibliographic record

VenueTraduire · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsHistorical Studies in Education
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le 1er janvier 2013, j’ai reçu une lettre d’information sur la prison à perpétuité, envoyée par une association humanitaire italienne. Carmelo Musumeci, un détenu condamné à vie que j’avais interviewé quelques années auparavant, y adressait aux lecteurs des vœux de bonne année teintés d’amertume et exprimait son désespoir vis-à-vis de sa condition de « mort-vivant » qui n’était pas destinée à changer. Face à son message, je me suis sentie triste et impuissante, et je me suis demandé si je pou...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0170.010
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0060.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraduireSame topicHealth, Medicine and SocietyFrench-language works237,207