MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895609253 · doi:10.5539/jas.v10n10p513

Incidence of Leaf Spot Disease Caused by Cercosporidium personatum in Resistant, Susceptible and Hybridized Population of Groundnut Cultivars

2018· article· en· W2895609253 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. C. Kottayi, D. D. Saoji, S. E. Pawar, A. D. Choudhary

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPeanut Plant Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCultivarIncidence (geometry)BiologyPopulationVeterinary medicineLeaf spotDisease resistantHorticultureAgronomyPlant disease resistanceMedicineGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The disease incidence of Cercosporidium personatum in field was analysed in the hybridized population derived from the resistant mutant lines of the cultivar ICGV-87304 and TAG-24 & TG-26. Reciprocal crosses were performed using the same parents. The comparison of disease incidence in hybridized population was made with resistant cultivar Girnar-1. Susceptible parents TAG-24 and TG-26 showed disease incidence of 14.08 and 16.40%, respectively while Girnar-1 and the resistant mutant parents showed percentage infection ranging from 0.06-0.96%. The plants raised from the hybridized population showed the percent infection ranging from 0.01 to 0.02 %.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.876
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicPeanut Plant Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207