MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895631262 · doi:10.1016/j.nima.2019.01.074

A beamline for fundamental neutron physics at TRIUMF

2019· article· en· W2895631262 on OpenAlexafffund
Shahid Ahmed, T. Andalib, Michael Barnes, C.B. Bidinosti, Y. Bylinsky, J. Chak, Mala Das, Charles A. Davis, B. Franke, Michael Gericke, P. Giampa, Michael E. Hahn, Sean Hansen-Romu, K. Hatanaka, B. Jamieson, David Jones, K. Katsika, S. Kawasaki, W. Klassen, A. Konaka, E. Korkmaz, F. Kuchler, L. L. Kurchaninov, Μ. Lang, L. Lee, T. Lindner, Kirk W. Madison, J. Mammei, R. Mammei, Jean Martin, R. Matsumiya, R. Picker, E. Pierre, W. D. Ramsay, Yi‐Nong Rao, W. R. Rawnsley, Lori Rebenitsch, C.A. Remon, Wolfgang Schreyer, A. Sikora, S. Sidhu, J. E. Sonier, B. Thorsteinson, S. Vanbergen, W. T. H. van Oers, Yutaka Watanabe, Dimo Yosifov

Bibliographic record

VenueNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaTRIUMFUniversity of WinnipegUniversity of Manitoba
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science LondonNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceCanada Research ChairsCanada Foundation for InnovationResearch Manitoba
KeywordsBeamlinePhysicsCyclotronNuclear physicsSpallationBeam (structure)NeutronProtonSpallation Neutron SourceProton SynchrotronLarge Hadron ColliderOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.310
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0050.005
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3100.137

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated EquipmentSame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207