Les enseignants et le dictionnaire : sentiments, attitudes motivationnelles, connaissances déclarées et pratiques personnelles d’utilisation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
sum Le prsent article documente le type de sentiments et les attitudes motivationnelles de 300 enseignants qubcois du primaire et du secondaire face aux dictionnaires papier et lectroniques, ainsi que leurs connaissances dictionnairiques et pratiques d'utilisation dclares. Les rsultats rvlent que les enseignants entretiennent des sentiments positifs envers les dictionnaires. De plus, ils se sentent gnralement comptents dans l'utilisation de cet ouvrage et y accordent un degr de valeur lev, en plus de dtenir des ouvrages varis. Cependant, les connaissances et usages dclars demeurent relativement rudimentaires, ce qui souligne les besoins de formation pour une meilleure exploitation personnelle et didactique des dictionnaires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it