Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet ouvrage, Daniel Poitras analyse les relations complexes entre l’historiographie et l’expérience du temps au xxe siècle en se penchant particulièrement sur la vie et l’œuvre de trois penseurs emblématiques de la France et du Québec : Michel de Certeau, François Furet et Fernand Dumont. Dès lors, il interroge l’ancrage de l’historien dans sa société et l’évolution de son rapport au passé et au futur. Le lecteur suit ainsi la trajectoire de ces auteurs arrivés à la vie intellectuelle pendant les années 1950 – alors que l’Histoire était encore synonyme de progrès – et qui ont vécu les bouleversements du siècle. De l’entre-deux-guerres à la guerre d’Algérie, de la Révolution tranquille à la crise d’Octobre, en passant par Mai 68 et la chute du communisme, ils cherchent à trouver le sens de cette « crise du temps » et, ce faisant, nous offrent des clés uniques pour comprendre notre propre relation à l’histoire au xxie siècle.Ce livre s’adresse tout autant aux spécialistes qu’aux amateurs que pourrait intéresser l’itinéraire de trois des plus importants penseurs de l’historiographie dans le monde francophone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".