MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895773172 · doi:10.1101/433284

Automatic local resolution-based sharpening of cryo-EM maps

2018· preprint· en· W2895773172 on OpenAlexaff
Erney Ramírez-Aportela, José Luis Vilas, Roberto Melero, Pablo Conesa, Marta Martínez, David Maluenda, Javier Mota, Amaya Jiménez, Javier Vargas, R. Marabini, J.M. Carazo, Carlos Óscar S. Sorzano

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadEuropean CommissionComunidad de Madrid
KeywordsSharpeningInterpretabilityResolution (logic)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceImage resolutionAlgorithmSuperresolutionComputer visionImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recent technological advances and computational developments, have allowed the reconstruction of cryo-EM maps at near-atomic resolution structures. Cryo-EM maps benefit significantly of a “postprocessing” step, normally referred to as “sharpening”, that tends to increase signal at medium/high resolution. Here, we propose a new method for local sharpening of volumes generated by cryo-EM. The algorithm (LocalDeblur) is based on a local resolution-guided Wiener restoration approach, does not need any prior atomic model and it avoids artificial structure 1 factor corrections. LocalDeblur is fully automatic and parameter free. We show that the new method significantly and quantitatively improving map quality and interpretability, especially in cases of broad local resolution changes (as is often the case of membrane proteins).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207