Delay Reduction in Multi-Hop Device-to-Device Communication Using Network Coding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper considers the problem of reducing the broadcast decoding delay of wireless networks using instantly decodable network coding- based device-to-device communications. In contrast with the previous works that assume a fully connected network, this paper investigates a partially connected configuration in which multiple devices are allowed to transmit simultaneously. To that end, different events occurring at each device are identified so as to derive an expression for the probability distribution of the decoding delay. Afterward, the joint optimization problem over the set of transmitting devices and packet combination of each is formulated. The optimal solution of the joint optimization problem is derived using a graph-theoretic approach by introducing the cooperation graph in which each vertex represents a transmitting device with a weight translating its contribution to the network. This paper solves the problem by reformulating it as a maximum weight clique problem which can efficiently be solved. Numerical results suggest that the proposed solution outperforms state-of-the-art schemes and provides significant gain, especially for poorly connected networks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".