MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895791146 · doi:10.2351/1.5062069

Direct manufacturing of net-shape functional components/test-pieces for aerospace, automotive and other applications

2010· article· en· W2895791146 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lijue Xue, Yangsheng Li, Shaodong Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh-Temperature Coating Behaviors
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerospaceNear net shapeAutomotive industryMachiningMechanical engineeringConsolidation (business)CADImpellerProcess (computing)Materials scienceManufacturing engineeringComputer scienceEngineering drawingEngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Laser consolidation (LC) is a novel computer-aided manufacturing process being developed by the Industrial Materials Institute of National Research Council of Canada (NRC-IMI). This rapid manufacturing process produces net-shape functional metallic parts layer-by-layer directly from a CAD model by using a laser beam to melt the injected powder and re-solidifying it on the substrate or previous layer. As an alternative to the conventional machining process, this novel manufacturing process builds net-shape functional parts or features on an existing part by adding instead of removing materials. In this paper, laser consolidation of various high performance materials (such as Ni-alloys, tool steels, etc.) will be demonstrated to manufacture functional components or test-pieces (such as shell-based mold inserts, impeller, intersected multi-hexgon tube, goblet shape, etc.) for potential aerospace, automotive and other applications. In the paper, dimensional accuracy of various laser-consolidated test-pieces will be measured and compared with CAD models. In addition, an example will be given on laser consolidation to build complex cold spray nozzles that are difficult to make otherwise and significantly improve the performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.470

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHigh-Temperature Coating BehaviorsFrench-language works237,207