MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895791845 · doi:10.1088/1361-6501/aae6f9

High-accuracy roundness measurements at NRC

2018· article· en· W2895791845 on OpenAlexaff
C Aldous, I D Leroux, B J Eves

Bibliographic record

VenueMeasurement Science and Technology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRoundness (object)Computer scienceMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An uncertainty budget for measuring the roundness of high-quality parts using the reversal method has been developed. A systematic source of uncertainty due to the non-linear nature of the and operators has been experimentally verified and a simple method to remove the bias developed. The dominant source of uncertainty for the measurement of high-quality parts is the difficulty of realizing the correct measurand when the form of the part varies along the rotation axis. Example uncertainty budgets for both a steel ring and a glass hemisphere are presented. The expanded uncertainty ( k = 2) for the out-of-roundness of the hemisphere is 4.0 nm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.956

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMeasurement Science and TechnologySame topicAdvanced Measurement and Metrology TechniquesFrench-language works237,207