MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895821314 · doi:10.3138/cjfs.23.2.26

Le téléthéâtre québécois des premiers temps : croisements médiatiques (Hubert Aquin, Claude Jutra, Marcel Dubé et Louis-Georges Carrier)

2014· article· en· W2895821314 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
François Harvey

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Film Studies · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLiterature, Musicology, and Cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article studies intermedial combinations that characterized Radio-Canada’s early 1950’s television plays, by analyzing the works of three tv writers mostly known for their non-television career: Hubert Aquin, Claude Jutra and Marcel Dubé. We will first see that the author Hubert Aquin, hired as a radio director in 1954, quickly became familiar with the television media by developing in his first teleplay Histoire d’amour (1955) a certain sensibility to the dramatic qualities of the small screen. Secondly, we will observe that Claude Jutra used most of his film knowledge in his screenplay L’École de la peur, broadcasted by CBFT in 1953, making his television drama a work mostly determined by cinematographic properties. Finally, among the dramatics that Marcel Dubé submitted to television treatment, we will analyze more specifically Chambre à louer, composed in 1953 and adapted by Louis-Georges Carrier in 1954, studying the changes that the director made to the text while transposing it to the television format. In light of our observations on Radio-Canada’s early teleplays, we will notice that radio-canadian television fictions developed in partnership with several forms of expression, contributing in creating the emerging Québec television a composite medium, at the boundaries of theater and cinema.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.745
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Film StudiesSame topicLiterature, Musicology, and Cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207