MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895879514 · doi:10.1109/tim.2018.2871808

Accurate Step Length Estimation for Pedestrian Dead Reckoning Localization Using Stacked Autoencoders

2018· article· en· W2895879514 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsDead reckoningComputer scienceEstimationPedestrianIndependence (probability theory)Key (lock)Artificial intelligencePhoneMachine learningComputer visionData miningGlobal Positioning SystemStatisticsMathematicsEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pedestrian dead reckoning (PDR) is a popular indoor localization method due to its independence of additional infrastructures and the wide availability of smart devices. Step length estimation is a key component of PDR, which has an important influence on the performance of PDR. Existing step length estimation models suffer from various limitations such as requiring knowledge of user's height, lack of consideration of varying phone carrying ways, and dependence on spatial constraints. To solve these problems, we propose a deep learning-based step length estimation model, which can adapt to different phone carrying ways and does not require individual stature information and spatial constraints. Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms existing popular step length estimation methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.765

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it