MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895894446 · doi:10.7939/r3m61bz12

Health promotion policies and practices in Nova Scotia schools

2013· article· en· W2895894446 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jessie‐Lee D. McIsaac

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSchool Health and Nursing Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaNova (rocket)Political scienceHealth promotionEconomic growthGeographyHealth careEngineeringEconomicsAeronautics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canadian school jurisdictions have adopted health promotion policies and guidelines as part of a broader comprehensive strategy to address childhood obesity, but there is limited research that has investigated how these “naturally occurring” population level interventions have influenced changes in school environments and student behaviours. Following the dissemination of various policies and initiatives related to health promotion in schools, the Province of Nova Scotia (NS) offered a case for research inquiry to describe how recent provincial policies were implemented. The purpose of this research was to provide contextual understanding of the adoption, implementation and impact of health promotion policies and practices in NS. Quantitative research was employed to describe provincial trends in children’s nutrition behaviour and weight status and to assess school practices across NS schools. Qualitative methods provided context on the processes that influenced implementation using a case study approach. From the quantitative analysis, although there were some improvements in diet quality, energy intake and healthy beverage consumption of children over time, there was no significant effect observed on body weight. Furthermore, schools reported greater adoption of curriculum-related practices, rather than practices that could foster comprehensive (i.e. holistic) approaches to school health. Contextual information from the qualitative case studies provided critical insight to understanding policy, organizational and individual outcomes. Schools that were stimulated by jurisdictional vision and provided with relevant resources and support exhibited processes that facilitated adoption of health promotion policies. Commitment, leadership and a supportive school culture was also found to be important to help schools overcome barriers to implementation. Overall, the contextual focus of this research provided a comprehensive account of health promotion policy implementation to advance the effectiveness and dissemination of population-level interventions in schools. Considering the multifaceted behavioural and social structural influences of obesity, illuminating this context in population-level interventions is critical to improve implementation and the overall impact on population-level weight status. Fostering collaboration between health and education sectors and establishing a broad system for support is essential to develop an understanding of the mutual benefit between health and learning and to progress the adoption, implementation and sustainability of school health initiatives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta LibrarySame topicSchool Health and Nursing EducationFrench-language works237,207