Empirical Approximation for the Stochastic Fundamental Diagram of Traffic Flow on Signalized Intersection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The wide scattering nature of the fundamental diagram (FD) with observed flow-density data may be associated with the dynamical traffic flow process, especially on signalized intersection. To describe the uncertainty of FD, in this work we established stochastic fundamental diagram (SFD) which is defined by the distributions of shockwave speed. Our approach is based on a two-level stochastic process of the traffic flow system in terms of the dynamics of traffic density and state mode associated with signal phases which is named switching linear dynamical systems (SLDS). Then, variational Bayesian learning method is adopted to compute the distributions of SFD parameter to approximate the experimental distributions of shockwave calculated by the observed flow-density data. Given traffic flow data from the NGSIM program, the verification result demonstrated that the SFD can be more helpful to capture the main features of the observed widely scattering of the flow-density data compared with FD. With the shockwave speed sampled from the SFD, the SLDS could describe the dynamic characteristics of traffic flow and be applied to the maximum likelihood estimation of traffic density or flow rate. Because it is simple and automatically calculated, the SFD provides an alternative description for fundamental diagram and its uncertainty in the traffic flow.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".