MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895908163 · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty883

Landscape of multi-tissue global gene expression reveals the regulatory signatures of feed efficiency in beef cattle

2018· article· en· W2895908163 on OpenAlexafffund
Hui‐Zeng Sun, Ke Zhao, Mi Zhou, Yanhong Chen, Le Luo Guan

Bibliographic record

VenueBioinformatics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaAlberta Livestock and Meat AgencyAlberta Agriculture and Forestry
KeywordsTranscriptomeBiologyResidual feed intakeGeneFeed conversion ratioRumenGene expressionBeef cattlePhenotypeGeneticsRegulator geneGene expression profilingTraitComputational biologyBody weightBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MOTIVATION: Feed efficiency is an important trait for sustainable beef production that is regulated by the complex biological process, but the mode of action behinds it has not been clearly defined. Here, we aimed to elucidate the regulatory mechanisms of this trait through studying the landscape of the genome-wide gene expression of rumen, liver, muscle and backfat tissues, the key ones involved in the energy metabolism. RESULTS: The transcriptome of 189 samples across four tissues from 48 beef steers with varied feed efficiency were generated using Illumina HiSeq4000. The analysis of global gene expression profiles of four tissues, functional analysis of tissue-shared and -unique genes, co-expressed network construction of tissue-shared genes, weighted correlations analysis between gene modules and feed efficiency-related traits in each tissue were performed. Among four tissues, the transcriptome of muscle tissue was distinctive from others, while those of rumen and backfat tissues were similar. The associations between co-expressed genes and feed efficiency related traits at single or all tissues level exhibited that the gene expression in the rumen, liver, muscle and backfat were the most correlated with feed conversion ratio, dry matter intake, average daily gain and residual feed intake, respectively. The 19 overlapped genes identified from the strongest module-trait relationships in four tissues are potential generic gene markers for feed efficiency. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The distribution of gene expression data can be accessed at https://www.cattleomics.com/transcriptome. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.211
Threshold uncertainty score0.292

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioinformaticsSame topicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockFrench-language works237,207