MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895925114 · doi:10.3997/2214-4609.201800936

Removal of Artefacts in Kx-Ky Domain to Improve Seismic Images over the Brunswick No. 6 Massive Sulphide Deposit, Canada

2018· article· en· W2895925114 on OpenAlexaffabout
Saeid Cheraghi, Gilles Bellefleur, B. R. Roberts, Don White

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrestackGeologyClassification of discontinuitiesAzimuthOffset (computer science)SeismologyGaussianLimitingMineralogyComputer scienceEngineeringGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Application of seismic method for deep exploration in crystalline rock environment and specifically for mineral exploration has improved dramatically during past two decades. In such environment, prestack dip moveout (DMO) corrections and post stack migration are still important processing tools. Surveys with narrow-azimuth offset distribution often cause artefacts after DMO processing. In this study, we propose a method to reduce those artefacts on final seismic volumes. We illustrate our approach with 3D seismic data acquired over the Brunswick No.6 mine in Canada. Non-orthogonal acquisition geometry and patch of the Brunswick No. 6 3D survey led to narrow-azimuth DMO artefacts that reduced the overall quality of seismic volumes. By using a filtering approach based on the application of weighted Laplacian-Gaussian filter in the Kx-Ky domain, we reduced the noise and improved the continuity of reflections. Better results were obtained by limiting offsets to less than 3 km. We also imaged short and flat reflections observed previously only in the shallow part of prestack time migration (PSTM) volume. Those short reflections appears as diffractions on the filtered DMO stacked section, indicating that they originate from small geological bodies or discontinuities in the subsurface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.704
Threshold uncertainty score0.873

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedingsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207