MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895946039 · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2874815

A Distributed Mode Selection Approach Based on Evolutionary Game for Device-to-Device Communications

2018· article· en· W2895946039 on OpenAlexafffund
Yujie Li, Wei Song, Ziwen Su, Lianfen Huang, Zhibin Gao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceQuality of serviceThroughputUser equipmentComputer networkRelayCellular networkSelection (genetic algorithm)Mode (computer interface)Distributed computingWirelessBase stationTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligencePower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As one of the key technologies for the fifth generation (5G) mobile networks, device-todevice (D2D) communications offer promising benefits such as high spectrum efficiency, traffic offloading, and enhanced coverage. Depending on the resource sharing between D2D users and regular cellular users, a D2D user equipment (UE) can dynamically switch its communication mode to improve the quality of service (QoS) and user experience. Mode selection is an essential issue to ensure the QoS of D2D UEs while maximizing the system capacity. In this paper, we investigate the D2D mode selection problem from a novel perspective. In addition to the classic cellular mode and direct reuse mode, we further consider a relay mode for D2D UEs. Moreover, in order to address a potentially large population of D2D UEs, we propose an evolutionary game-based approach for D2D mode selection. The evolutionary game is formulated with a utility function that takes into account both the achievable throughput of D2D UEs and the radio resource consumption. Based on the evolutionary game formulation, we implement selection dynamics, i.e., replication by imitation, in a device-controlled mode selection algorithm. To evaluate the performance of the proposed mode selection algorithm, we conduct simulations to compare it with three baseline schemes, including an approach based on maximum signal-to-interference-plus-noise, a distance-based approach, and a random approach. As shown in the simulation results, the proposed approach achieves higher utilities than the baseline schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score0.693

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207