MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895947840 · doi:10.2351/1.5061201

Laser rapid manufacturing at the raja ramanna centre for advanced technology, India

2007· article· en· W2895947840 on OpenAlexaff
Ashish Kumar Nath, C. P. Paul, Pankaj Bhargava, P. Ganesh, T. Reghu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaserMaterials scienceInconel 625Selective laser sinteringInconelLaser power scalingCladding (metalworking)MetallurgyMechanical engineeringOptoelectronicsComposite materialOpticsSinteringEngineeringMicrostructure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have indigenously developed high power transverse flow CW CO2 lasers upto 15 kW at the Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology (RRCAT). These lasers have been integrated with 3-axis & 5 axis laser workstations for various material processing applications, including Laser Rapid Manufacturing (LRM). We have adopted both dynamic laser cladding and laser sintering approach in rapid manufacturing various shapes and geometries with SS316L, Titanium, Inconel-625 and Colmonoy-6. The deposited material was free from cracks, porosity and other surface and bulk defects. The property of deposited material were characterized using various mechanical and metallurgical techniques. This paper briefly presents laser rapid manufacturing activities at RRCAT

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdditive Manufacturing Materials and ProcessesFrench-language works237,207