Пацієнт зі стабільною ішемічною хворобою серця в Україні та Європі: результати 5-річного реєстру CLARIFY
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CLARIFY (The prospeCtive observational LongitudinAl RegIstry oF patients with stable coronary arterY disease) is a large multicenter project in the patients with a stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Within 5 years (2009–2014) 32,703 patients with confirmed diagnosis of CAD from 45 countries worldwide took part in the registry. Study results have demonstrated the significant differences between the current international standards of management and real-life clinical practice. Despite the fact that Ukrainian doctors actively used the complete list of the medicinal products recommended in the stable CAD (ASA, statins, BBs, ivabradine, ACE inhibitors), the control of therapy efficacy was very low and not only relative to the symptoms (after 5-year follow-up, angina attacks were persistent in 74 % of patients versus 16.9 % of the European patients). It should be noted that the clinical status of patients enrolled in Ukraine was more severe compared with the general group: 24.1 % of patients with the severe angina (ІІІ FC), in Europe – 2.2 %, in the world population – 1.6 %. Rate of the myocardial revascularization (surgical, endovascular) was very low in Ukraine as for 5-year study – only 5.9 %. As a result, our patients had 2-fold need in the hospitalization, 2-fold rate of fatal MI and acute cerebrovascular accidents (stroke + TIA) and 3-fold rate of the unstable angina. Control of such main risk factors of CAD, as BP levels < 140/90 mm Hg, LDL cholesterol levels < 1.8 mmol/L, HR < 70 beats per minute was insufficient both in the Ukrainian and global populations. During the study both Ukrainian and European patients have not demonstrated the dynamics in life style modification (majority of subjects continued sedentary lifestyle, were overweight, had signs of the abdominal obesity and smoked). Taking into consideration the results of the CLARIFY study, significant optimization of management of patients with stable CAD is still necessary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it