MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895980981 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.09.348

Parameter Subset Selection in Differential Equation Models with Dead Time

2018· article· en· W2895980981 on OpenAlexaff
Anh-Khoa Vo, Aly Elraghy, Kimberley B. McAuley

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOdeRanking (information retrieval)Selection (genetic algorithm)Ordinary differential equationEstimation theoryApplied mathematicsMathematicsNonlinear systemDifferential (mechanical device)Model parameterDelay differential equationDifferential equationComputer scienceMathematical optimizationAlgorithmMathematical analysisPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A methodology is proposed for parameter ranking and parameter subset selection for nonlinear ordinary differential equation (ODE) models with time delay, in which delay is treated as an unknown model parameter. The methodology builds on earlier algorithms for ranking model parameters in systems without time delay (Yao et al., 2003; Thompson et al., 2009) and for finding the optimum number of parameters for estimation (Wu et al., 2011; McLean and McAuley, 2012a). A polymerization reactor system for producing bio-source polyether is used to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method in comparison with prior results obtained by Cui et al. (2015) who neglected the time delay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIFAC-PapersOnLineSame topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207