MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2895996266 · doi:10.7202/1051219ar

Les effets d’un programme de formation parentale francophone sur les comportements-défis d’enfants autistes

2018· article· fr· W2895996266 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
M. Rousseau, Suzie McKinnon, Jennifer Ilg, Jacinthe Bourassa, Annie Paquet, Vincent Lagard, Céline Clément

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue québécoise de psychologie · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily and Disability Support Research
Canadian institutionsCentre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux des LaurentidesCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-JeanUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresCentre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-AppalachesCentre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Mauricie-et-du-Centre-du-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les comportements-défis présents chez certains enfantsayant un diagnostic du trouble du spectre de l’autisme (TSA)engendrent des difficultés et se répercutent sur leurfamille. Un des moyens pouvant soutenir ces familles est la formationparentale. Cette étude vise à évaluer les effetsd’une formation parentale francophone offerte à 49 parentsd’enfants ayant un TSA québécois etfrançais. Au terme de la formation, une réduction descomportements-défis est observée cliniquement.Parallèlement à cette réduction, les comportementsde communication et de socialisation s’améliorent. Lesrésultats montrent qu’il est possible d’implanter leprogramme avec des résultats équivalents dans descontextes d’intervention distincts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue québécoise de psychologieSame topicFamily and Disability Support ResearchFrench-language works237,207