Colostrum feeding shapes the hindgut microbiota of dairy calves during the first 12 h of life
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study evaluated the effect of feeding non-heated and heated colostrum on the mucosa- and digesta-associated microbiota in the colon of dairy calves during the first 12 h of life. Thirty-two neonatal Holstein male calves were fed: no colostrum (NC, n = 8), non-heated colostrum (FC, n = 12) and heated colostrum (HC (60 °C, 60 min), n = 12) immediately after birth. The abundances of mucosa- and digesta-associated total bacteria were higher in the colon of FC fed calves compared to those fed no colostrum (NC) at 12 h of life. Compare to NC calves, a higher proportion of mucosa- and digesta-associated Clostridium cluster XIVa and Bifidobacterium, and a lower abundance of mucosa and digesta-associated E. coli were detected in the colon of FC and HC fed calves, as well as a tentatively lower relative abundance of Escherichia-Shigella genus in colon mucosa of HC fed calves. In addition, HC calves had lower abundances of E. coli and higher abundances of Bifidobacterium in mucosa-associated microbiota than FC fed calves. Our results suggest that feeding non-heated colostrum immediately after birth benefit neonatal calves with increased Bifidobacterium and decreased opportunistic pathogenic E. coli and Escherichia-Shigella genus in the colon, and feeding heated colostrum can fortify such effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".