MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2896088553 · doi:10.1121/1.5068130

Soundscape characteristics in Southern Resident Killer Whale critical habitats

2018· article· en· W2896088553 on OpenAlexaffabout
Svein Vagle, Caitlin O’Neill, Sheila J. Thornton, Harald Yurk

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoundscapeHabitatWhaleFisheryEndangered speciesCritical habitatSound (geography)GeographyRange (aeronautics)Marine mammalCritically endangeredAmbient noise levelFishingOceanographyEnvironmental scienceEcologyGeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Southern Resident Killer whales (Orcinus orca) (SRKW) are an endangered group of orcas with current range of Pacific North East from California to Northern British Columbia and spend most of the summer months in and around the Salish Sea. This group of mammals feed primarily on fish, are very local, and live in tight-knit family units called pods. July 1 2017 census reported 77 animals; which now has been reduced to 76 by a more recent death. Anthropogenic underwater noise, primarily from commercial and recreational vessels is suspected to have detrimental effects on these whales. Here, we present results from a seven month, continuous sound recording (125 kHz acoustic bandwidth), whale centered study to monitor and interpret different soundscapes in SRKW critical habitats. The six different locations studied have significantly different acoustic transmission characteristics and cover open ocean areas, where natural sound spectral levels are high, to areas where anthropogenic noise-sources dominate. Possible implications of these different characteristics on the ability of the orcas to communicate and find prey are discussed. [Work funded by the Ocean Protection Plan (OPP) of the Government of Canada.]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America→Same topicMarine animal studies overview→French-language works237,207→