MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896090530 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.180153

Minimal Clinically Important Improvement of Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 in Rheumatoid Arthritis

2018· article· en· W2896090530 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michael M. Ward, Isabel Castrejón, Martin Bergman, Maria I. Alba, Lori C. Guthrie, Theodore Pincus

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin DiseasesNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMedicineComorbidityOdds ratioConfidence intervalPercentileRheumatoid arthritisCharlson comorbidity indexSeverity of illnessInternal medicinePopulationMedical diagnosisEmergency medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To compare the severity of illness of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) between those hospitalized at academic medical centers and those hospitalized at community hospitals. METHODS: In this population based cross-sectional survey, data on all hospitalizations of patients with SLE in California, New York, and Pennsylvania in 2000 were obtained from discharge abstracts submitted by acute care hospitals to state health planning agencies. Patients hospitalized at one of 36 academic medical centers in these states (N = 2072) were compared to patients hospitalized at community hospitals (N = 9373). The primary measures of severity of illness were the SLE Comorbidity Index, a weighted index of SLE manifestations and comorbid medical conditions based on discharge diagnoses, and long lengths of stay, defined as stays that exceeded the 90th percentile of hospital stays in the same diagnosis-related group in the United States. RESULTS: Compared to patients at community hospitals, patients at academic medical centers had substantially higher scores on the SLE Comorbidity Index (odds ratio for each 1-point increase 1.27, 95% confidence interval 1.15-1.40, p < 0.0001) and were more likely to have long lengths of stay (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.42-1.91, p < 0.0001). Patients at academic medical centers also had higher scores on the SLE Comorbidity Index (OR for each 1-point increase 1.16, 95% CI 1.07-1.27, p = 0.0002) and were more likely to have long lengths of stay (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.08-1.49, p = 0.004) compared to patients at large (> or = 300 beds) community hospitals in the same metropolitan areas. Results for the SLE Comorbidity Index were similar in the subset of patients with SLE as the primary discharge diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Patients with SLE hospitalized at academic medical centers are generally more severely ill than those hospitalized at community hospitals, including large community hospitals in the same area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of RheumatologySame topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchFrench-language works237,207