MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896132905 · doi:10.1161/str.49.suppl_1.wp279

Abstract WP279: Modelling the Impact of Multiple Mobile Stroke Units Surrounding a Metropolitan Area

2018· article· en· W2896132905 on OpenAlexaff
Jessalyn K. Holodinsky, Noreen Kamal, Charlotte Zerna, Luke Zhu, Michael D. Hill, Mayank Goyal

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOlder Adults Driving Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStroke (engine)PopulationMetropolitan areaPathologyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The Mobile Stroke Unit (MSU) has brought stroke imaging and alteplase administration to the field, shortening onset to needle time in some situations. In areas with widespread urban sprawl, having MSUs stationed in the community may improve patient outcomes. For patients with suspected large vessel occlusion (LVO) using the Los Angeles Motor Scale (LAMS) we compare the probability of good outcome for patients taken direct to Comprehensive Stroke Centre (CSC) (mothership) vs. utilizing multiple MSUs. Methods: Using conditional probability models for patients with suspected stroke with LVO (LAMS ≥4) the probability of good outcome for the mothership and MSU scenarios were generated. A sliding dichotomy was used to define good outcome, mRS 0-2 at 90 days was used for LVO patients and mRS 0-1 was used for non-LVO patients. Data from the HERMES collaboration was used for EVT patients, data from the Emberson meta-analysis (extrapolated to the HERMES population for LVO) was used for alteplase treated patients. Probability of good outcome for intracranial hemorrhage and stroke mimics was considered time invariant. Results: The results are visualized using temporal-spatial diagrams with one CSC and four MSUs stationed at various distances from the CSC with each MSU covering one quarter of the city. The addition of four MSUs in a small geographic area (60 min radius from CSC) does not predict improved patient outcomes. However, as the size of the geographic area increases the relevance of the MSU becomes apparent in the areas closest to the MSU. Conclusions: From a patient outcomes perspective multiple MSUs may be necessary to have the possibility of superior patient outcomes than the mothership transport method if they are situated far away from the CSC. This in addition to the individual environment and cost-effectiveness should be taken into context when deciding the best place to house future MSUs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicOlder Adults Driving StudiesFrench-language works237,207