Master regulators of genetic interaction networks mediating statin drug response in <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> vary with genetic background
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Determination of genetic interaction networks (GINs) surrounding drug targets identifies buffering genes and provides molecular insight into drug response in individuals. Here we used backcross methodology to create Saccharomyces cerevisiae deletion libraries in three genetic backgrounds resistant to statins, which are additional to the statin-sensitive S288C deletion library that has provided much of what is known about GINs in eukaryotes. Whole genome sequencing and linkage group analysis confirmed the genomic authenticity of the new deletion libraries. Statin response was probed by drug-gene interactions with atorvastatin and cerivastatin treatments, as well as gene-gene interactions with the statin target HMG1 and HMG2 genes or the sterol homeostatic ARV1 gene. The 20 GINs generated from these interactions were not conserved by function or topology across the four genetic backgrounds. Centrality measures and hierarchical agglomerative clustering identified master regulators that if removed collapsed the networks. Community structure distinguished a characteristic early secretory pathway pattern of gene usage in each genetic background. ER stress in statin-resistant backgrounds was buffered by protein folding genes, which was confirmed by reduced activation of the unfolded protein response in statin-resistant backgrounds relative to the statin-sensitive S288C background. These network analyses of new gene deletion libraries provide insight into the complexity of GINs underlying individual drug response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".