A Bayesian unsupervised learning approach for identifying soil stratification using cone penetration data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a novel perspective to understanding the spatial and statistical patterns of a cone penetration dataset and identifying soil stratification using these patterns. Both local consistency in physical space (i.e., along depth) and statistical similarity in feature space (i.e., logQ t –logF r space, where Q t is the normalized tip resistance and F r is the normalized friction ratio, or the Robertson chart) between data points are considered simultaneously. The proposed approach, in essence, consists of two parts: (i) a pattern detection approach using the Bayesian inferential framework and (ii) a pattern interpretation protocol using the Robertson chart. The first part is the mathematical core of the proposed approach, which infers both spatial pattern in physical space and statistical pattern in feature space from the input dataset; the second part converts the abstract patterns into intuitive spatial configurations of multiple soil layers having different soil behavior types. The advantages of the proposed approach include probabilistic soil classification and identification of soil stratification in an automatic and fully unsupervised manner. The proposed approach has been implemented in MATLAB R2015b and Python 3.6, and tested using various datasets including both synthetic and real-world cone penetration test soundings. The results show that the proposed approach can accurately and automatically detect soil layers with quantified uncertainty and reasonable computational cost.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".