Proper orthogonal decomposition analysis of a circular cylinder undergoing vortex-induced vibrations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) is utilized to analyze the wake-dynamics of a low-mass ratio circular cylinder undergoing vortex-induced vibrations in the initial and upper branches (U* = U∞/fND = 4.07, 5.32). POD allows for characterizing dynamics at frequencies which differ from the cylinder oscillation that cannot be captured with conventional phase-averaging. POD modes contributing to the dominant coherent motions are described in detail. Fourier analysis techniques are used to identify relationships between the POD modes describing non-periodic dynamics linked to the slow-varying base flow and result in a modulation in the strength of vortex shedding. Heuristic models based on mean-field theory are proposed for the POD temporal coefficients. The modelled wake dynamics are found to account for a significant contribution to the Reynolds stresses. In the initial branch, it is found that 6 POD modes are required to capture the salient aspects of the flow, while in the upper branch, 7 modes are required.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".