MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896186511

Micro Essay Researching Foreign Law in a Bunch of Common Law Jurisdictions Just Got WAY Easier

2018· article· en· W2896186511 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ronald E. Wheeler

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislationCommon lawLawCategorizationIndex (typography)Political scienceTaxonomy (biology)BusinessComputer scienceWorld Wide Web
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

JustisOne is an expertly designed, easy to use database with never-before-seen navigation tools that make researching foreign law fun. It houses cases from numerous common law jurisdictions such as the UK, Ireland, Australia, Canada, 18 Caribbean jurisdictions, and Singapore. Their developers created a unique legal taxonomy with more than 1.5 million terms to categorize every case across all of the included jurisdictions. Moreover, JustisOne provides an index of cases and legislation on more than 120 other services so that users can seamlessly link to relevant documents on other services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0100.009
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicArtificial Intelligence in LawFrench-language works237,207