Objetos contemporâneos para ensino-aprendizagem da ressuscitação cardiopulmonar
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The teaching-learning process in the contemporary world must be cause for concern for the advancement of technology and the profile of digital natives. The use of Digital Educational Technologies (DET) should be inserted in the teaching of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR). The American Heart Association (AHA) encourages the teaching of CPR in different modalities. Objective: To develop DET -videotape, simulation video, and evaluation instruments -theoretical and practical, on adult CPR in Basic Life Support (BLS), using the Automatic External Defibrillator (AED) in the hospital setting. Methodology: This is an applied research and technological production developed at the Ribeiro Preto Nursing School of the University of So Paulo (EERP / USP). The population was composed of 16 experts in Urgency and Emergency (UE). For the evaluation and validation, through adapted instruments, of the script/screenplay and storyboard of a videotape, script/screenplay and storyboard of a simulation video, questionnaire and Objective and Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) on adult CPR in BLS with the use of AED in a hospital environment. For selection of the expertises, a minimum score of five points was adopted according to The model proposed by Fleming, Reynolds and Wallace (2009), which consists of Phase I: Pre-production, Phase II: Production and Phase III: Post-production, was adopted. For the preparation of the questionnaire the basic rules for the elaboration of the Multiple Choice Question (MCQ) of the manual of the National Council of Medical Examiners were applied. The OSCE has been developed in accordance with the guidelines of the Medical Council of Canada. The AHA guidelines published in 2015 were the first adopted literature. The research was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (REC), according to Resolution 466/2012. For the evaluation of the data, descriptive statistics and interrater concordance analysis by Gwet's AC1 were applied. Categorization of agreement according to Landis and Koch (1997). The videos were validated in relation to the objective, content, relevance, environment, verbal language and inclusion of topics. The questionnaire and OSCE were validated in relation to organization, objectivity and clarity. Results: The experts are composed by nurses (100%), female predominance, mean age of 36.56 years, average training time of 12.93 years, 93.75% with a master's degree, 93.75% with clinical practice in the UE in adults, distributed in the Southeast, Midwest and Northeast regions of Brazil, 62.5% classified as Fehring (1987), with ten or more points. All the items of the validation instruments registered a predominance in positive responses. Regarding inter-rater agreement, the videotape was classified as "moderate agreement", simulation video in "considerable agreement", questionnaire and OSCE in "nearperfect agreement". The videotape was finalized in 17 minutes and 17 seconds, the simulation video with 13 minutes and 22 seconds, the questionnaire with 20 MCQ and OSCE with 40 items. Conclusion: The use of videos and the adoption of appropriate assessment tools in the teaching-learning process is a challenge. Through the use of validated objects in this study it is possible to conduct teaching, research and extension strategies in a contemporary and updated context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it