Treating Symptoms of Morning Sickness: The First Dual Release Combination of Doxylamine-Pyridoxine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modified release tablet preparations are sought when there is a need to provide clinical solutions which are not achieved optimally with the standard release products. Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP) affect most pregnancies. Symptomatic treatment aims to improve woman’s quality of life, and counteract dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, need for hospitalization and attendant risk of maternal and fetal complications. Until recently, the only agent approved by Canada, USA, South Korea. Israel and Singapore has been the delayed release combination of doxylamine and pyridoxine (Diclectin®/ Diclegis®). All other countries worldwide do not presently have a pregnancy- approved anti emetic drug. Due to its delayed release properties, Diclectin®/ Diclegis® begins to exert its antiemetic effect 6-8 hours after ingestion, and hence symptom relief may be delayed and necessitate the use of an immediate release medication. In November 2016 the FDA approved Bonjesta®, a novel, dual- release combination of doxylamine and pyridoxine, whereby a rapid release phase is followed by a delayed release phase, thus overcoming the time delay in action of the delayed release combination of doxylamine and pyridoxine. In this article we review the unique properties of this new drug in the context of other medications where modified- release forms have been effective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".