Single-Stage LED Driver Achieves Electrolytic Capacitor-Less and Flicker-Free Operation With Unidirectional Current Compensator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AC-connected light emitting diode (LED) drivers experience imbalanced energy between input and output in a half-line cycle. To achieve the flicker-free operation, the imbalanced energy needs to be buffered, often by energy-dense electrolytic capacitors. However, electrolytic capacitors are also well-known for their short lifespan. These capacitors are the limiting factor of an LED drivers' lifespan. High voltage film capacitors and a buck converter have been used in the proposed LED driver to buffer the imbalanced energy. When Pin > PLED, the extra energy is transferred from the ac input directly to the high voltage film capacitors. When Pin <; PLED, the energy is transferred from the high voltage film capacitors to the output by the buck converter. The imbalanced energy goes through two power conversion steps in the proposed LED driver, which is one time less than other comparable electrolytic capacitor-less designs, enabling a higher efficiency to be achieved. A 28 W flyback topology based experimental prototype had been built and tested to verify the proposed design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".