MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896246835 · doi:10.1109/ms.2018.2874323

Toward Solving Social and Technical Problems in Open Source Software Ecosystems: Using Cause-and-Effect Analysis to Disentangle the Causes of Complex Problems

2018· article· en· W2896246835 on OpenAlexaff
Josianne Marsan, Mathieu Templier, Patrick Marois, Bram Adams, Kévin Carillo, Georgia Leida Mopenza

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Software · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOpen Source Software Innovations
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalUniversité Laval
FundersFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
KeywordsOpen source softwareKey (lock)SoftwareSoftware developmentSocial software engineeringSoftware peer reviewComputer scienceOpen sourceSoftware engineeringSoftware analyticsScale (ratio)Knowledge managementData scienceBusinessProcess managementSoftware development processSoftware constructionComputer securityOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many open source software (OSS) products today are market leaders, 1 which suggests that the development of OSS is key to the growth of the software industry. OSS projects increasingly tend to be incorporated in large-scale projects or "software ecosystems" to reduce effort and accelerate innovation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.041
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.109
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0410.109
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.006
Bibliometrics0.0240.010
Science and technology studies0.0050.012
Scholarly communication0.0110.020
Open science0.0040.011
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE SoftwareSame topicOpen Source Software InnovationsFrench-language works237,207