MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896275080 · doi:10.1145/3269206.3271790

Inferring Probabilistic Contagion Models Over Networks Using Active Queries

2018· article· en· W2896275080 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Abhijin Adiga, Vanessa Cedeno-Mieles, Chris J. Kuhlman, Madhav Marathe, S. S. Ravi, Daniel J. Rosenkrantz, Richard E. Stearns

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicComplex Network Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing InnovationMcMaster UniversityDefense Threat Reduction AgencyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceInferenceProbabilistic logicEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionCascadeBayesian networkMachine learningData miningArtificial intelligenceTheoretical computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem of inferring unknown parameters of a networked social system is of considerable practical importance. We consider this problem for the independent cascade model using an active query framework. More specifically, given a network whose edge probabilities are unknown, the goal is to infer the probability value on each edge by querying the system. The optimization objective is to use as few queries as possible in carrying out the inference. We present approximation algorithms that provide provably good estimates of edge probabilities. We also present results from an experimental evaluation of our algorithms on several real-world networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.009
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComplex Network Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207