MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896279709 · doi:10.7202/1051396ar

Peut-il exister une logique de la notation musicale?

2018· article· fr· W2896279709 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jean-Marie Chevalier

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches sémiotiques · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesNotationPhilosophyArtLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Que fait-on lorsqu’on note un morceau de musique? Quelles sont les conditions de possibilité de la notation musicale? Que voit-on au juste sur une partition? Quelques éléments d’analyse de l’écriture de la musique sont proposés ici dans le sillage de la sémiotique peircienne. Une analogie entre notation musicale et notation logique révèle un réquisit d’iconicité des partitions. On peut distinguer trois niveaux d’iconicité de la musique correspondant à la trichotomie des hypoicônes : si les sons sont analogues à des images, la partition constitue une représentation en partie diagrammatique de rapports et d’intervalles, tandis que la signification musicale et l’interprétant émotionnel ont une nature métaphorique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.678
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.596
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches sémiotiquesSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207