MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896293031 · doi:10.4000/books.irhis.2900

Le sceau et la devise à la fin du Moyen Âge : une nouvelle identité sigillaire ?

2011· book-chapter· fr· W2896293031 on OpenAlex
Laurent Hablot

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePublications de l’Institut de recherches historiques du Septentrion eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedieval and Early Modern Justice
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vers le milieu du XIVe siècle, un nouveau système emblématique se développe dans les milieux de cours européens. Aux côtés des armoiries, des cimiers et des supports apparaissent de nouveaux signes destinés à identifier les puissants : les devises, composées d’un signe figuré (la devise stricto sensu), parfois associée, à une sentence, le mot, à des couleurs et à un monogramme. Le sceau constitue un des principaux vecteurs de ce qui peut être qualifié de nouvelle mode emblématique. L’intérêt ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it