MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896293031 · doi:10.4000/books.irhis.2900

Le sceau et la devise à la fin du Moyen Âge : une nouvelle identité sigillaire ?

2011· book-chapter· fr· W2896293031 on OpenAlexaff
Laurent Hablot

Bibliographic record

VenuePublications de l’Institut de recherches historiques du Septentrion eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedieval and Early Modern Justice
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vers le milieu du XIVe siècle, un nouveau système emblématique se développe dans les milieux de cours européens. Aux côtés des armoiries, des cimiers et des supports apparaissent de nouveaux signes destinés à identifier les puissants : les devises, composées d’un signe figuré (la devise stricto sensu), parfois associée, à une sentence, le mot, à des couleurs et à un monogramme. Le sceau constitue un des principaux vecteurs de ce qui peut être qualifié de nouvelle mode emblématique.L’intérêt ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.020
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublications de l’Institut de recherches historiques du Septentrion eBooksSame topicMedieval and Early Modern JusticeFrench-language works237,207