MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896304665 · doi:10.7202/1051673ar

Discours et pratiques en matière de stratégie carbone : le cas de la grande distribution intégrée en France1

2018· article· fr· W2896304665 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jean‐Philippe Croizean, Philippe Robert-Demontrond, Julien Bouillé, Marjorie Allano-Frey

Bibliographic record

VenueManagement international · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’objet de cette recherche est de comprendre, dans le champ institutionnel de la grande distribution française, les stratégies carbone mises en place par les distributeurs intégrés Auchan, Casino et Carrefour. En croisant la théorie des cités de Boltanski et Thévenot et l’approche néo-institutionnaliste, nous étudions les discours et les pratiques sur la sobriété carbone. Ces apports théoriques sont, ensuite, mobilisés afin de comprendre les comportements et les stratégies mis en oeuvre par la grande distribution en matière de sobriété carbone. Enfin, une discussion est proposée sur la place que les distributeurs intégrés accordent au problème plus global du changement climatique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManagement internationalSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207