Analytical solution for one-dimensional consolidation of double-layered soil with exponentially time-growing drainage boundary
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, the exponentially time-growing drainage boundary is introduced to study the one-dimensional consolidation problem of double-layered soil. First, the one-dimensional consolidation equations of soil underlying a time-dependent loading are established. Then, the analytical solution of excess pore water pressure and average consolidation degree is obtained by utilizing the method of separation of variables when the soil layer is separately undergone instantaneous load and single-stage load. The validity of the present solution is proven by the comparison with other existing analytical solution. Finally, the influence of soil properties and loading scheme on the consolidation behavior of soil is investigated in detail. The results indicate that, the present solution can be degraded to Xie’s solution utilizing Terzaghi’s drainage boundary by adjusting the interface parameter, that is to say, Xie’s solution can be regarded as a special case of the present solution. The interface parameter has a significant influence on the excess pore water pressure of soil, and the larger interface parameter means the better drainage capacity of the soil layer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it