MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896368519

Bilateralism Between the Strong and Weak States in an International System

2018· book· en· W2896368519 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zaglul Haider

Bibliographic record

VenueLAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing eBooks · 2018
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBangladesh Politics, Society, and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBilateralismSpanish Civil WarDeclarationPolitical scienceGenocideState (computer science)Government (linguistics)Foreign policyNational interestPosition (finance)UnilateralismPolitical economyPublic administrationInternal conflictLawEconomic historySociologyHistoryEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Back in 1924 U.S. Secretary of the State Charles Hughes stated:“ Foreign Policies are not built upon abstractions. They are the results of national interest arising from some immediate exigency or standing out vividly in historical perspective” Canadian policy towards the Liberation war of Bangladesh in 1971 was not an isolated issue rather it was the product of its well-defined national interest. Against the backdrop of the outbreak of the Civil war and Pakistan army’s wanton genocide in former East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) Canadian Government observed studied silence and followed a policy of non-interference in the internal matters of other state. At this point Canadian government refused to take any public position and was totally reluctant to involve in this kind of civil conflict. The government of Canada also perceived that pious declaration against war would not achieve any thing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.011
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0000.008
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing eBooksSame topicBangladesh Politics, Society, and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207