Après la séparation, avec qui les enfants devraient-ils vivre ? Une analyse de l’opinion québécoise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La garde partagée – ou alternée – représente un idéal de coparentalité égalitaire sans toutefois être adoptée par la majorité de parents séparés. Face à ce paradoxe apparent, cet article a pour objectif de mieux comprendre l’opinion de la population à propos de la garde des enfants. Pour ce faire, un sondage a été réalisé auprès d’un échantillon composé de 1 202 Québécois et Québécoises âgés de 18 ans et plus. Les données recueillies révèlent que la garde partagée représente, globalement, le mode de garde jugé idéal. Cependant, une analyse de regroupement en classes latentes a permis d’effectuer des distinctions importantes en dégageant quatre profils d’opinion sur cette question. La comparaison de ces profils sur le plan sociodémographique et de certaines des croyances et valeurs liées au mode de garde fournit des pistes d’explication de la diversité des postures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".