Hyperhidrosis – pathogenesis and treatment methods
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hyperhidrosis is a condition characterized by excessive sweating which may have a primary or secondary cause. The diagnosis is facilitated by the guidelines of the Canadian Hyperhidrosis Advisory Committee. Prior to initiating treatment, the severity of the condition is determined based on the Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale or objective examinations (Minor test or gravimetric method). The therapeutic options depend on the type of hyperhidrosis and are divided into topical, systemic and procedural modalities. The first-line drugs are topical preparations including aluminium salts, glycopyrrolate 2% and tannic acid solutions. Systemic therapies are based primarily on anti-cholinergic and -adrenolytic drugs. Procedural therapies include botulinum toxin treatment, iontophoresis, laser therapy as well as techniques based on microwaves and ultrasounds. If these modalities fail, the remaining option is surgery, including sympathectomy or surgical removal of sweat glands. streszczenie Nadpotliwo to nadmierne wydzielanie potu, ktre moe mie przyczyn pierwotn lub wtrn. Diagnoz uatwiaj wytyczne Canadian Hyperhidrosis Advisory Committee. Przed rozpoczciem terapii okrela si stopie nasilenia dolegliwoci wg skali subiektywnej (Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale) lub obiektywnych bada (test Minora, metoda grawimetryczna). Leczenie zaley od typu nadpotliwoci i
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it