MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896429140 · doi:10.5114/dr.2018.78073

Hyperhidrosis – pathogenesis and treatment methods

2018· article· en· W2896429140 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jakub Sazanów-Lubelski, Beata Bergler‐Czop, Paulina Barasińska, Natalia Noga

Bibliographic record

VenueDermatology Review · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperhidrosisMedicineDermatologyPathogenesisPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hyperhidrosis is a condition characterized by excessive sweating which may have a primary or secondary cause.The diagnosis is facilitated by the guidelines of the Canadian Hyperhidrosis Advisory Committee.Prior to initiating treatment, the severity of the condition is determined based on the Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale or objective examinations (Minor test or gravimetric method).The therapeutic options depend on the type of hyperhidrosis and are divided into topical, systemic and procedural modalities.The first-line drugs are topical preparations including aluminium salts, glycopyrrolate 2% and tannic acid solutions.Systemic therapies are based primarily on anti-cholinergic and β-adrenolytic drugs.Procedural therapies include botulinum toxin treatment, iontophoresis, laser therapy as well as techniques based on microwaves and ultrasounds.If these modalities fail, the remaining option is surgery, including sympathectomy or surgical removal of sweat glands.streszczenie Nadpotliwość to nadmierne wydzielanie potu, które może mieć przyczynę pierwotną lub wtórną.Diagnozę ułatwiają wytyczne Canadian Hyperhidrosis Advisory Committee.Przed rozpoczęciem terapii określa się stopień nasilenia dolegliwości wg skali subiektywnej (Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale) lub obiektywnych badań (test Minora, metoda grawimetryczna).Leczenie zależy od typu nadpotliwości i dzieli się na miejscowe, ogólne i zabiegowe.Preparaty miejscowe: sole glinu, 2% glikopirolan i roztwory kwasu taninowego, są lekami pierwszego wyboru.W terapii ogólnej stosuje się głównie leki antycholinergiczne i β-adrenolityczne.Do metod zabiegowych należą: terapia toksyną botulinową, jonoforeza, laseroterapia, zastosowanie mikrofal i ultradźwięków.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDermatology ReviewSame topicSympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207