MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896429919 · doi:10.1109/taes.2018.2875555

GP-PDA Filter for Extended Target Tracking With Measurement Origin Uncertainty

2018· article· en· W2896429919 on OpenAlexaff
Yunfei Guo, Yong Li, Ratnasingham Tharmarasa, Thiagalingam Kirubarajan, Murat Efe, Bahadir Sarikaya

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersHigher Education Discipline Innovation ProjectNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsClutterRadar trackerComputer scienceFilter (signal processing)Tracking (education)EstimatorGaussian processProbabilistic logicAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceRadarGaussianComputer visionControl theory (sociology)MathematicsStatisticsTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extended target tracking (ETT) is an issue in high-resolution radar surveillance, ship tracking, and video tracking. Most of the previous works focus on tracking an ellipsoidal extended target without measurement origin uncertainty (missed detections and clutter). In this paper, a new estimator called the Gaussian process probabilistic data association (GP-PDA) filter is proposed to track an irregularly shaped extended target with measurement origin uncertainty. First, a generalized measurement model for ETT using the Gaussian process (GP) is presented. Both the interior scattering points and the external clutter are considered in this model. Second, a GP-based gating technique is constructed to select validated measurements to feed the filter. Third, the GP-PDA filter is proposed to simultaneously estimate the kinematic state and the contour state of the extended target with measurement origin uncertainty. It is proven that the GP-PDA is a generalized version of the classic PDA, and the latter is a special case of the former in the point target tracking applications. Finally, the GP-based posterior Cramér-Rao lower bound (PCRLB) is derived to evaluate the performance of the ETT with measurement origin uncertainty. Two cases of the PCRLB are discussed, with the number of scattering points being known and unknown. Simulation results verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic SystemsSame topicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207