MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896430632

Undermining Industrial Citizenship: Deindustrialization and the Rise of Precarious Employment in the Lanarkshire Coalfield, Scotland and Sudbury Hard Rock Mining, Canada

2016· article· en· W2896430632 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ewan Gibbs, Shelley Condratto

Bibliographic record

VenueENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRestructuringCitizenshipEmbeddednessDeindustrializationPolitical scienceMultinational corporationPoliticsIndustrial relationsEconomyBusinessSociologyLawEconomicsSocial science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a comparative analysis of the changing status of work and employment within two major mining areas which experienced prolonged decline during the second half of the twentieth century. It illuminates the social impact of industrial restructuring and divestment within sectors which had traditionally provided large-scale stable male employment. A focus is placed on how structures of community embeddedness, stable employment and worker ‘voice’ were understood by workers and undermined by the institution of neoliberal employment relations since the 1980s. The analysis centres on the role of commonalities and differences within mining communities in the Lanarkshire coalfield, Scotland, and the Sudbury hard rock mining industry in Ontario, Canada. This emphasises comparative aspects of political economy through considering how the role of nationalised industries in Lanarkshire, multinational ownership in Ontario, state policy and sectoral differences between coal and hard rock mining have shaped outcomes in both cases. Interviews with former mineworkers and members of mining families, and some current mineworkers in the case of Sudbury, are used to understand the construction of occupational identities and structures of industrial citizenship. This was premised upon the maintenance of secure employment and the exercise of ‘voice’ through trade union recognition and consultative structures. The embedded nature of mining activities within locales, including the role of occupational associations and the British National Coal Board (NCB) and Canadian mining companies’ involvement in community social life are also underlined as key to constructing conceptions of industrial citizenship. The paper centres on counterpoising Lanarkshire’s experience of final closures and the end of deep mining with the divestment of non-production activities and less profitable mines in Sudbury. The paper’s analysis centres on worker and community responses to radical sectoral restructuring. In the case of Lanarkshire this entailed the closure of the county’s last colliery, Cardowan, in 1983 in the build up to the 1984-5 miners’ strike. Although Sudbury retains an active mining sector, the industry has experienced extensive restructuring since the 1970s characterized by an industrial relations system allowing the hollowing out firm level employment and the growing use of subcontractors by new multinational owners. These workers lack access to the employment security of the ‘core’ unionised workforce. In both cases therefore secure employment within mining has been lost, but the paper contrasts the experience of workers who left the coal mining industry in Scotland with those who experienced the establishment of flexible conditions in Canadian hard rock mining. The rise of precarious work in a sector traditionally associated with stable employment in Sudbury is emphasised through an analysis of the narratives to gauge employee perceptions and how this has affected understandings of the industry, and occupational and locale identities. These are counterpoised with the Lanarkshire narratives of the loss of industrial activities and the rise of a service sector labour market marked by insecure employment practices in predominantly feminised sectors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score0.727

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0170.008
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam)Same topicMining and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207