MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2896452105 · doi:10.4414/cvm.2017.00476

Akutes Koronarsyndrom ohne ST-Hebungen: ESC-Richtlinien 2015

2017· article· de· W2896452105 on OpenAlexaff
Christian Müller, Stefan Windecker, Marco Roffi

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiovascular Medicine · 2017
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myocardial Infarction Research
Canadian institutionsMedtronic (Canada)Abbott (Canada)
FundersStiftung für Kardiovaskuläre Forschung BaselSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungEuropean CommissionEdwards LifesciencesSingulexSphingotec GmbHAlereNational Science FoundationMedicines CompanyBoston Scientific CorporationMerck Sharp and DohmeSchweizerische Herzstiftung
KeywordsMedicineAcute coronary syndromeUnstable anginaCardiologyInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionTroponinCoronary angiographyTriageRevascularizationMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Die neuen Richtlinien der Europäischen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie zur Diagnose und Therapie des akuten Koronarsyndroms ohne ST-Hebungen bestätigen vollumfänglich die Diagnose-und Therapiekonzepte der letzten Version der Guidelines aus 2011 [1, 2], beinhalten aber auch sieben wichtige und klinisch relevante Neuerungen.Diese Neuerungen sollen hier kurz beschrieben werden: 1. präzisere Unterscheidung zwischen AMI und instabiler Angina pectorisDiagnose und Risikostratifizierung; 2. ESC-0/1-h-Algorithmus; 3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCardiovascular MedicineSame topicAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchFrench-language works237,207