Akutes Koronarsyndrom ohne ST-Hebungen: ESC-Richtlinien 2015
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 2015 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute coronary syndrome in patients presenting without ST-segment elevation comprise seven important and clinically-relevant modifications pertaining to the following: (1) a more precise differentiation between acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina pectoris; (2) a simple triage-algorithm enabling us to rapidly "rule-out" or "rule-in" acute myocardial infarction using the high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T or I assay for detecting blood troponin on admission and 1 hour thereafter; (3) duration of cardiac rhythm monitoring; (4) platelet aggregation therapy including its begin and duration; (5) anticoagulation; (6) urgency and vascular approach for coronary angiography und potential coronary revascularization; (7) relevance of consequent and longlasting control of risk factors. As supplement to the 2015 ESC guidelines, for the first time, three additional documents with case-control studies have been elaborated, seeking to illustrate the concrete clinical impact of these new key recommendations based on short clinical case vignettes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".